Re: [PATCH 0/8] nvmem: Let layout drivers be modules

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 2023-03-06 15:03, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2023-03-06 14:57, schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
> > On 2023-03-06 14:35, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > michael@xxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 06 Mar 2023 14:01:34 +0100:
> > >
> > > > > Miquel Raynal (8):
> > > > >   of: Fix modalias string generation
> > > > >   of: Change of_device_get_modalias() main argument
> > > > >   of: Create an of_device_request_module() receiving an OF node
> > > > >   nvmem: core: Fix error path ordering
> > > > >   nvmem: core: Handle the absence of expected layouts
> > > > >   nvmem: core: Request layout modules loading
> > > > >   nvmem: layouts: sl28vpd: Convert layout driver into a module
> > > > >   nvmem: layouts: onie-tlv: Convert layout driver into a module
> > > >
> > > > With the fixes series [1] applied:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the series! Looks good to me. I believe both series can 
> > > live
> > > in separate tress, any reason why we would like to avoid this? I am 
> > > keen
> > > to apply [1] into the mtd tree rather soon.
> >
> > Given past events with nvmem patches I'm against that.
> >
> > Let's wait for Srinivas to collect pending patches, let them spend a
> > moment in linux-next maybe, ask Srinivas to send them to Greg early if
> > he can. That way maybe you can merge Greg's branch (assuming he 
> > doesn't
> > rebase).
>
> Mh? None of these fixes have anything to do with nvmem (except maybe 
> patch
> 4/4). The bugs were just discovered while I was testing this series. 
> But
> OTOH they are kind of a prerequisite for this series. So what are you
> suggesting here?

I'm sorry, I didn't realize you are commenting on linked mtd series.
I thought you want to take nvmem patches series over mtd tree ;) My
bad.