Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/panel: Add driver for Novatek NT36523

[Jianhua Lu]

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:38:52PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11.03.2023 13:32, Jianhua Lu wrote:
> > Add a driver for panels using the Novatek NT36523 display driver IC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> [...]
> 
> > +
> > +static int nt36523_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel,
> > +			       struct drm_connector *connector)
> > +{
> > +	struct panel_info *pinfo = to_panel_info(panel);
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < pinfo->desc->num_modes; i++) {
> > +		const struct drm_display_mode *m = &pinfo->desc->modes[i];
> > +		struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> > +
> > +		mode = drm_mode_duplicate(connector->dev, m);
> > +		if (!mode) {
> > +			dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to add mode %ux%u@%u\n",
> > +				m->hdisplay, m->vdisplay, drm_mode_vrefresh(m));
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		mode->type = DRM_MODE_TYPE_DRIVER;
> > +		if (pinfo->desc->num_modes == 1)
> > +			mode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED;
> That's not quite correct, as that means "if you have more than one
> defined panel mode (say 60Hz and 120 Hz), there will be no preferred one".
This piece of code I see in the other panels, so I'm not sure if it is
correct. Should
if (pinfo->desc->num_modes > 1)
			mode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED;
is correct?
> 
> Konrad
> >