Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/panel: Add driver for Novatek NT36523

From: Neil Armstrong
Date: Mon Mar 13 2023 - 04:08:57 EST


On 11/03/2023 13:46, Jianhua Lu wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:38:52PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:


On 11.03.2023 13:32, Jianhua Lu wrote:
Add a driver for panels using the Novatek NT36523 display driver IC.

Signed-off-by: Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@xxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]

+
+static int nt36523_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel,
+ struct drm_connector *connector)
+{
+ struct panel_info *pinfo = to_panel_info(panel);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pinfo->desc->num_modes; i++) {
+ const struct drm_display_mode *m = &pinfo->desc->modes[i];
+ struct drm_display_mode *mode;
+
+ mode = drm_mode_duplicate(connector->dev, m);
+ if (!mode) {
+ dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to add mode %ux%u@%u\n",
+ m->hdisplay, m->vdisplay, drm_mode_vrefresh(m));
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ mode->type = DRM_MODE_TYPE_DRIVER;
+ if (pinfo->desc->num_modes == 1)
+ mode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED;
That's not quite correct, as that means "if you have more than one
defined panel mode (say 60Hz and 120 Hz), there will be no preferred one".
This piece of code I see in the other panels, so I'm not sure if it is
correct. Should
if (pinfo->desc->num_modes > 1)
mode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED;
is correct?

I think only a single mode with DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED is preferred,
so:
if (i == 0)
mode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED;

would be the right thing to do.


Neil

Konrad