Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: convert simple paravirt functions to asm

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 07:24:17AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> The "normal" cases not using alternatives should rather be switched to
> static calls.

Or that.

> Whether it is possible to mix a static call with alternatives needs to
> be evaluated.

I'd prefer not to mix them. Either should be fine and if neither have
the required functionality, then it should be added depending on which
- static calls or alternatives - would make things simpler.

I'd love to get rid of the whole paravirt glue and use the facilities we
have in the tree instead.

But no hurry - it should be nice and clean work. :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette