Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: add bindings for focaltech,fts

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sun Mar 12 2023 - 16:47:58 EST


On 12/03/2023 10:32, Joel Selvaraj wrote:
> Add devicetree bindings for the Focaltech FTS touchscreen drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Selvaraj <joelselvaraj.oss@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts.yaml | 81 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..07fe595cc9ed
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts.yaml

I have doubts you will cover here all possible FTS controllers, so
filename should be more specific, e.g. choose the oldest device compatible.

> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Focaltech FTS I2C Touchscreen Controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Joel Selvaraj <joelselvaraj.oss@xxxxxxxxx>
> + - Caleb Connolly <caleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: touchscreen.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - focaltech,fts5452
> + - focaltech,fts8719

Missing blank line

> + reg:
> + const: 0x38
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + reset-gpios:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + avdd-supply:
> + description: a phandle for the regulator supplying analog power (2.6V to 3.3V).

Drop "a phandle for the"

> +
> + vddio-supply:
> + description: a phandle for the regulator supplying IO power (1.8V).

Ditto

> +
> + focaltech,max-touch-number:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + description: max number of fingers supported

Why this is not implied from compatible? IOW, why this differs between
boards?

If this property stays, then anyway "focaltech,max-touch", not number.
There is no such unit suffix as number.

> + minimum: 2
> + maximum: 10
> +
> + touchscreen-size-x: true
> + touchscreen-size-y: true

Drop these two

> +
> +additionalProperties: false

and then use unevaluatedProperties: false
so all properties from common schema apply. Unless these are not really
valid for the *device*?

> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reset-gpios
> + - focaltech,max-touch-number
> + - touchscreen-size-x
> + - touchscreen-size-y
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> + &i2c5 {

i2c

> + status="okay";

Drop status

Anyway this should pop warnings... Please run `make dt_binding_check`
(see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions).

> +
> + touchscreen: focaltech@38 {

Node names should be generic.
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation

Also, drop label touchscreen.

> + compatible = "focaltech,fts8719";
> + reg = <0x38>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&tlmm>;
> + interrupts = <31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> +


Best regards,
Krzysztof