[PATCH] Update relatime comments to include equality

From: Stephen Kitt
Date: Sat Mar 25 2023 - 05:00:29 EST


relatime also updates atime if the previous atime is equal to one or
both of the ctime and mtime; a non-strict interpretation of "earlier
than" and "younger than" in the comments allows this, but for clarity,
this makes it explicit.

Pointed out by "epiii2" and "ctrl-alt-delor" in
https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/740862/86440.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/inode.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 4558dc2f1355..3ec5a8f7b644 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1804,8 +1804,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bmap);

/*
* With relative atime, only update atime if the previous atime is
- * earlier than either the ctime or mtime or if at least a day has
- * passed since the last atime update.
+ * earlier than or equal to either the ctime or mtime,
+ * or if at least a day has passed since the last atime update.
*/
static int relatime_need_update(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct inode *inode,
struct timespec64 now)
@@ -1814,12 +1814,12 @@ static int relatime_need_update(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct inode *inode,
if (!(mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_RELATIME))
return 1;
/*
- * Is mtime younger than atime? If yes, update atime:
+ * Is mtime younger than or equal to atime? If yes, update atime:
*/
if (timespec64_compare(&inode->i_mtime, &inode->i_atime) >= 0)
return 1;
/*
- * Is ctime younger than atime? If yes, update atime:
+ * Is ctime younger than or equal to atime? If yes, update atime:
*/
if (timespec64_compare(&inode->i_ctime, &inode->i_atime) >= 0)
return 1;

base-commit: 65aca32efdcb0965502d3db2f1fa33838c070952
--
2.30.2