Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/msm: add support for SM8550

[Neil Armstrong]

On 29/03/2023 22:13, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 29/03/2023 22:52, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 5:38 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 11:15:17 +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > > This adds support for the MDSS/DPU/DSI on the Qualcomm SM8550 platform.
> > > >
> > > > This patchset is based on the SM8450 display support serie at [1].
> > > >
> > > > In order to work, the following patchsets are required:
> > > > - PM8550 LDO fix at [2]
> > > > - DISPCC driver at [3]
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks!
> > >
> > > [2/7] dt-bindings: display/msm: document DPU on SM8550
> > >        https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4557e40338d2
> > > [3/7] dt-bindings: display/msm: document MDSS on SM8550
> > >        https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/0e4205eb8663
> >
> > And now failing on linux-next just as my bot reported:
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8550-dpu.example.dts:24:18:
> > fatal error: dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sm8550.h: No such file or
> > directory
> >     24 |         #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sm8550.h>
> >        |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > compilation terminated.
> > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:419:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8550-dpu.example.dtb]
> > Error 1
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8550-mdss.example.dts:25:18:
> > fatal error: dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sm8550.h: No such file or
> > directory
> >     25 |         #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sm8550.h>
> >        |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > compilation terminated.
> >
> > Please fix. And quickly please. Fixes in the DRM tree seem to take
> > forever to get in...
>
> I pushed the fix, so it will arrive in linux-next tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Please excuse me for breaking it again. I checked that the patches were merged, but didn't notice that the header name was changed in the process. Mea culpa.

My bad I should have rebased and sent a v4 with the bindings only,

Neil

>