Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: marvell octeonTX2 GTI system atchdog driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/04/2023 12:23, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> Add binding documentation for the Marvell octeonTX2
> GTI system watchdog driver.

Subject: typo: atchdog

> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../watchdog/marvell-octeontx2-wdt.yaml       | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/marvell-octeontx2-wdt.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/marvell-octeontx2-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/marvell-octeontx2-wdt.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e509f26c61b9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/marvell-octeontx2-wdt.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/watchdog/marvell-octeontx2-wdt.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Marvell OcteonTX2 GTI system watchdog
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: watchdog.yaml#
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: marvell-octeontx2-wdt

That's not correct compatible. marvell is a vendor prefix.

Did you test the bindings before sending?

> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description:
> +      OcteonTX2 GTI system watchdog register space

Drop description, it is obvious.

> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description:
> +      OcteonTX2 GTI system watchdog interrupt number

Ditto

> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - interrupts
> +
> +additionalProperties: false

unevaluatedProperties: false instead

> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    soc {
> +        #address-cells = <2>;
> +        #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +        watchdog@802000040000 {
> +          compatible = "marvell-octeontx2-wdt";
> +          reg = <0x8020 0x40000 0x0 0x20000>;

Are you sure that this is correct DTS? 32-bit numbers are usually
8-digit long. Plus size of 0x20000 is crazy huge. And the unit address
is a bit unusual. Are you sure dtc W=1 does not say about any errors in
your DTS?


> +          interrupts = <0 38 1>;

Use defines for common flags.

> +        };
> +    };
> +
> +...

Best regards,
Krzysztof