Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add gate-clock

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/04/2023 19:33, David Yang wrote:
> Add DT bindings documentation for gate-clock, which can gate its output.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/gate-clock.yaml | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/gate-clock.yaml

Where is the changelog? What happened here?

> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/gate-clock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/gate-clock.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3c993cb7e9bb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/gate-clock.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/gate-clock.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Clock which can gate its output
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - David Yang <mmyangfl@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> +  Clock which can gate its output.
> +
> +  The registers map is retrieved from the parental dt-node. So the clock node
> +  should be represented as a sub-node of a "clock-controller" node.

If this is supposed to be used in parent schema, then reference it there.

> +
> +  See also: linux/clk-provider.h

How is this related to hardware? Also, referencing linux headers is
usually not good idea for bindings.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: gate-clock
> +
> +  '#clock-cells':
> +    const: 0
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description: Parent clock.
> +
> +  offset:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> +    description: Offset in the register map for the control register (in bytes).
> +
> +  bits:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> +    description: Bit index which controls the output.
> +
> +  clock-output-names:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - '#clock-cells'
> +  - offset
> +  - bits
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    gate-clock@cc.3 {

So you keep ignoring the comments... I don't know what happened here but
this code for sure looks wrong.

Did you test the changes?

Best regards,
Krzysztof