Re: [PATCH V7 0/6] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Support variable clocking

[neil . armstrong]

On 25/05/2023 17:57, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:39 AM Neil Armstrong
> <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 24/05/2023 14:49, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:45 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Hi Adam,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 8:49 PM Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Inki,
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't heard back from you on whether or not you want the bindings
> > > > > patch to be included with me resending the series as V7 or if you're
> > > > > OK with a single, stand-alone patch.
> > > > > Will you let me know?  I have the patch standing by waiting for
> > > > > instructions.  If you're not the right person to ask, please let me
> > > > > know who the right person is.
> > > >
> > > > Neil has also been collecting samsung-dsim patches. Maybe he can clarify.
> > >
> > > If it matters, my preference all along was to do the bindings as a
> > > separate thing once the driver updates were merged into the tree.
> > > Since the bindings can be done in different ways, I was hoping to have
> > > a separate discussion on the right way to do the bindings. If they
> > > need to be part of the series, I can do that.
> >
> > If you don't introduce compatibles, no need to send bindings, it can
> > be send separately.
>
> This series doesn't change any compatibility.
>
> > Can I apply this serie and 20230503163313.2640898-2-frieder@xxxxxxx ? seems all has been reviewed.
>
> Looking at the driver, it looks like linux-next has some newer
> features added into the driver since I started, so this series might
> need a re-base.  If that's the case, let me know, and I'll do the
> re-base.

Ok I'll pull the other bits and let you know if this one needs a rebase.

Neil

> adam
>
> > Neil
> >
> > > adam