Re: [PATCH] sh: hd64461: fix virq offsets

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 2:59 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-07-09 at 14:56 +0200, Artur Rojek wrote:
> > On 2023-07-09 14:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2023-07-09 at 14:13 +0200, Artur Rojek wrote:
> > > > A recent change to start counting SuperH IRQ #s from 16 breaks support
> > > > for the Hitachi HD64461 companion chip.
> > > >
> > > > Move the offchip IRQ base and HD64461 IRQ # by 16 in order to
> > > > accommodate for the new virq numbering rules.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: a8ac2961148e ("sh: Avoid using IRQ0 on SH3 and SH4")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Artur Rojek <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

> > > > --- a/arch/sh/cchips/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/arch/sh/cchips/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ endchoice
> > > >  config HD64461_IRQ
> > > >   int "HD64461 IRQ"
> > > >   depends on HD64461
> > > > - default "36"
> > > > + default "52"
> > > >   help
> > > > -   The default setting of the HD64461 IRQ is 36.
> > > > +   The default setting of the HD64461 IRQ is 52.
> > > >
> > > >     Do not change this unless you know what you are doing.
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/hd64461.h
> > > > b/arch/sh/include/asm/hd64461.h
> > > > index afb24cb034b1..6d85db6cf54b 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/hd64461.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/hd64461.h
> > > > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
> > > >  #define  HD64461_NIMR            HD64461_IO_OFFSET(0x5002)
> > > >
> > > >  #define  HD64461_IRQBASE         OFFCHIP_IRQ_BASE
> > > > -#define  OFFCHIP_IRQ_BASE        64
> > > > +#define  OFFCHIP_IRQ_BASE        80
> > > >  #define  HD64461_IRQ_NUM         16
> > > >
> > > >  #define  HD64461_IRQ_UART        (HD64461_IRQBASE+5)
> > >
> > > I think it would be better to write this as (64 + 16) for consistency
> > > with the other changes made by Sergey.

Ideally, we want to have a #define for that...

> > Sure, I will send v2 with this change, although the same can't be
> > applied to HD64461_IRQ value above, so some inconsistency will exist
> > either way.
>
> That's okay, that's the user-facing part ;-).

Do we want to keep this Kconfig option? It is rather fragile, and there is
no in-tree config file overriding the default value.
Presumably it was introduced to support an out-of-tree board with
a different wiring.

BTW, there's also this (unused) definition:

arch/sh/include/mach-common/mach/hp6xx.h:#define HP680_HD64461_IRQ
 evt2irq(0x680)  /* IRQ4_IRQ */

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds