Re: [PATCH 5/9] regulator: mt6358: fix and drop type prefix in MT6366 regulator node names

From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Sun Aug 06 2023 - 23:54:44 EST

Next message: Rabara, Niravkumar L: "RE: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Intel Agilex5 clock manager"
Previous message: xingtong_wu: "[PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86/siemens: simatic-ipc: fix logic error in BX-59A"
In reply to: Eugen Hristev: "Re: [PATCH 5/9] regulator: mt6358: fix and drop type prefix in MT6366 regulator node names"
Next in thread: Chen-Yu Tsai: "[PATCH 6/9] regulator: mt6358: Make MT6366 vcn18 LDO configurable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 6:13 PM Eugen Hristev
<eugen.hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Chen-Yu,
>
> On 8/3/23 12:01, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > Il 03/08/23 09:42, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> >> The new MT6366 binding does away with the type prefix ("buck_", "ldo_")
> >> in the regulator node names. This better matches the PMIC pin names.
> >> Remaining underscores in names are also replaced with hyphens.
> >>
> >> Drop the type prefixes and replace remaining underscores to match the
> >> MT6366 binding.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > There is *no upstream devicetree* using any of those names, as the first
> > devices
> > that will use the MT6366 will be MT8186 Corsola, which are not
> > upstreamed yet.
> >
> > This means that this commit does not break ABI, so, I agree - which
> > implies....
> >
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Angelo
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/regulator/mt6358-regulator.c | 70 ++++++++++++++--------------
> >> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mt6358-regulator.c
> >> b/drivers/regulator/mt6358-regulator.c
> >> index 3cb2e6768e25..5a43a84c7a3e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/regulator/mt6358-regulator.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/regulator/mt6358-regulator.c
> >> @@ -536,68 +536,68 @@ static const struct mt6358_regulator_info
> >> mt6358_regulators[] = {
> >> /* The array is indexed by id(MT6366_ID_XXX) */
> >> static const struct mt6358_regulator_info mt6366_regulators[] = {
> >> - MT6366_BUCK("buck_vdram1", VDRAM1, 500000, 2087500, 12500,
> >> + MT6366_BUCK("vdram1", VDRAM1, 500000, 2087500, 12500,
> >> 0x7f, MT6358_BUCK_VDRAM1_DBG0, 0x7f,
> >> MT6358_VDRAM1_ANA_CON0, 8),
> >> - MT6366_BUCK("buck_vcore", VCORE, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> + MT6366_BUCK("vcore", VCORE, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> 0x7f, MT6358_BUCK_VCORE_DBG0, 0x7f,
> >> MT6358_VCORE_VGPU_ANA_CON0, 1),
> >> - MT6366_BUCK("buck_vpa", VPA, 500000, 3650000, 50000,
> >> + MT6366_BUCK("vpa", VPA, 500000, 3650000, 50000,
> >> 0x3f, MT6358_BUCK_VPA_DBG0, 0x3f, MT6358_VPA_ANA_CON0, 3),
> >> - MT6366_BUCK("buck_vproc11", VPROC11, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> + MT6366_BUCK("vproc11", VPROC11, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> 0x7f, MT6358_BUCK_VPROC11_DBG0, 0x7f,
> >> MT6358_VPROC_ANA_CON0, 1),
> >> - MT6366_BUCK("buck_vproc12", VPROC12, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> + MT6366_BUCK("vproc12", VPROC12, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> 0x7f, MT6358_BUCK_VPROC12_DBG0, 0x7f,
> >> MT6358_VPROC_ANA_CON0, 2),
> >> - MT6366_BUCK("buck_vgpu", VGPU, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> + MT6366_BUCK("vgpu", VGPU, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> 0x7f, MT6358_BUCK_VGPU_ELR0, 0x7f,
> >> MT6358_VCORE_VGPU_ANA_CON0, 2),
> >> - MT6366_BUCK("buck_vs2", VS2, 500000, 2087500, 12500,
> >> + MT6366_BUCK("vs2", VS2, 500000, 2087500, 12500,
> >> 0x7f, MT6358_BUCK_VS2_DBG0, 0x7f, MT6358_VS2_ANA_CON0, 8),
> >> - MT6366_BUCK("buck_vmodem", VMODEM, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> + MT6366_BUCK("vmodem", VMODEM, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> 0x7f, MT6358_BUCK_VMODEM_DBG0, 0x7f,
> >> MT6358_VMODEM_ANA_CON0, 8),
> >> - MT6366_BUCK("buck_vs1", VS1, 1000000, 2587500, 12500,
> >> + MT6366_BUCK("vs1", VS1, 1000000, 2587500, 12500,
> >> 0x7f, MT6358_BUCK_VS1_DBG0, 0x7f, MT6358_VS1_ANA_CON0, 8),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vrf12", VRF12,
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vrf12", VRF12,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VRF12_CON0, 0, 1200000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vio18", VIO18,
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vio18", VIO18,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VIO18_CON0, 0, 1800000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vcn18", VCN18, MT6358_LDO_VCN18_CON0, 0,
> >> 1800000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vfe28", VFE28, MT6358_LDO_VFE28_CON0, 0,
> >> 2800000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vcn28", VCN28, MT6358_LDO_VCN28_CON0, 0,
> >> 2800000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vxo22", VXO22, MT6358_LDO_VXO22_CON0, 0,
> >> 2200000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vaux18", VAUX18,
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vcn18", VCN18, MT6358_LDO_VCN18_CON0, 0, 1800000),
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vfe28", VFE28, MT6358_LDO_VFE28_CON0, 0, 2800000),
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vcn28", VCN28, MT6358_LDO_VCN28_CON0, 0, 2800000),
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vxo22", VXO22, MT6358_LDO_VXO22_CON0, 0, 2200000),
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vaux18", VAUX18,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VAUX18_CON0, 0, 1800000),
>
> The line being shorter, can't you compact them on a single line now ?
> Here, and on other occasions in the changes you made.

I would prefer to do a final cleanup after all this has landed.
That makes the refactoring easier to read, i.e. identify the changes.

ChenYu

> Regards,
>
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vbif28", VBIF28,
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vbif28", VBIF28,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VBIF28_CON0, 0, 2800000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vio28", VIO28, MT6358_LDO_VIO28_CON0, 0,
> >> 2800000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_va12", VA12, MT6358_LDO_VA12_CON0, 0,
> >> 1200000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vrf18", VRF18, MT6358_LDO_VRF18_CON0, 0,
> >> 1800000),
> >> - MT6366_REG_FIXED("ldo_vaud28", VAUD28,
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vio28", VIO28, MT6358_LDO_VIO28_CON0, 0, 2800000),
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("va12", VA12, MT6358_LDO_VA12_CON0, 0, 1200000),
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vrf18", VRF18, MT6358_LDO_VRF18_CON0, 0, 1800000),
> >> + MT6366_REG_FIXED("vaud28", VAUD28,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VAUD28_CON0, 0, 2800000),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vdram2", VDRAM2, vdram2,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vdram2", VDRAM2, vdram2,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VDRAM2_CON0, 0, MT6358_LDO_VDRAM2_ELR0, 0x10),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vsim1", VSIM1, vsim,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vsim1", VSIM1, vsim,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSIM1_CON0, 0, MT6358_VSIM1_ANA_CON0, 0xf00),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vibr", VIBR, vibr,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vibr", VIBR, vibr,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VIBR_CON0, 0, MT6358_VIBR_ANA_CON0, 0xf00),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vusb", VUSB, vusb,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vusb", VUSB, vusb,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VUSB_CON0_0, 0, MT6358_VUSB_ANA_CON0, 0x700),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vefuse", VEFUSE, vefuse,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vefuse", VEFUSE, vefuse,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VEFUSE_CON0, 0, MT6358_VEFUSE_ANA_CON0, 0xf00),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vmch", VMCH, vmch_vemc,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vmch", VMCH, vmch_vemc,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VMCH_CON0, 0, MT6358_VMCH_ANA_CON0, 0x700),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vemc", VEMC, vmch_vemc,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vemc", VEMC, vmch_vemc,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VEMC_CON0, 0, MT6358_VEMC_ANA_CON0, 0x700),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vcn33", VCN33, vcn33,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vcn33", VCN33, vcn33,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VCN33_CON0_0, 0, MT6358_VCN33_ANA_CON0, 0x300),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vmc", VMC, vmc,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vmc", VMC, vmc,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VMC_CON0, 0, MT6358_VMC_ANA_CON0, 0xf00),
> >> - MT6366_LDO("ldo_vsim2", VSIM2, vsim,
> >> + MT6366_LDO("vsim2", VSIM2, vsim,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSIM2_CON0, 0, MT6358_VSIM2_ANA_CON0, 0xf00),
> >> - MT6366_LDO1("ldo_vsram_proc11", VSRAM_PROC11, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> + MT6366_LDO1("vsram-proc11", VSRAM_PROC11, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSRAM_PROC11_DBG0, 0x7f00,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSRAM_CON0, 0x7f),
> >> - MT6366_LDO1("ldo_vsram_others", VSRAM_OTHERS, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> + MT6366_LDO1("vsram-others", VSRAM_OTHERS, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSRAM_OTHERS_DBG0, 0x7f00,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSRAM_CON2, 0x7f),
> >> - MT6366_LDO1("ldo_vsram_gpu", VSRAM_GPU, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> + MT6366_LDO1("vsram-gpu", VSRAM_GPU, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSRAM_GPU_DBG0, 0x7f00,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSRAM_CON3, 0x7f),
> >> - MT6366_LDO1("ldo_vsram_proc12", VSRAM_PROC12, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> + MT6366_LDO1("vsram-proc12", VSRAM_PROC12, 500000, 1293750, 6250,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSRAM_PROC12_DBG0, 0x7f00,
> >> MT6358_LDO_VSRAM_CON1, 0x7f),
> >> };
> >
> >
> >
>

Next message: Rabara, Niravkumar L: "RE: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Intel Agilex5 clock manager"
Previous message: xingtong_wu: "[PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86/siemens: simatic-ipc: fix logic error in BX-59A"
In reply to: Eugen Hristev: "Re: [PATCH 5/9] regulator: mt6358: fix and drop type prefix in MT6366 regulator node names"
Next in thread: Chen-Yu Tsai: "[PATCH 6/9] regulator: mt6358: Make MT6366 vcn18 LDO configurable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]