External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On 09-08-23, 21:04, Sumit Gupta wrote:
Add exit hook and remove OPP table when all the CPU's in a policy
are offlined. It will fix the below error messages when onlining
first CPU from a policy whose all CPU's were previously offlined.
debugfs: File 'cpu5' in directory 'opp' already present!
debugfs: File 'cpu6' in directory 'opp' already present!
debugfs: File 'cpu7' in directory 'opp' already present!
Fixes: f41e1442ac5b ("cpufreq: tegra194: add OPP support and set bandwidth")
Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
index c90b30469165..66a9c23544db 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
@@ -454,6 +454,8 @@ static int tegra_cpufreq_init_cpufreq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
+
freq_table[j].driver_data = pos->driver_data;
freq_table[j].frequency = pos->frequency;
j++;
@@ -508,6 +510,16 @@ static int tegra194_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;
}
+static int tegra194_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct device *cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
+
+ dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(cpu_dev);
+ dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(policy->related_cpus);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int tegra194_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
@@ -535,6 +547,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver tegra194_cpufreq_driver = {
.target_index = tegra194_cpufreq_set_target,
.get = tegra194_get_speed,
.init = tegra194_cpufreq_init,
+ .exit = tegra194_cpufreq_exit,
.attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
};
If it is only about hotplugging of the CPUs, then you can also do this I guess.
commit 263abfe74b5f ("cpufreq: dt: Implement online/offline() callbacks")
But since your driver is capable of being built as a module, I suggest you try
to build it as one and insert remove it multiple times. It must cause you some
trouble as you don't implement an .exit() before this patch.
Eventually, I think you need to do both, what this patch and 263abfe74b5f do.
Just that the reasons need to be correct for both the changes.
--
viresh