Re: [-next v1] riscv: dts: starfive: visionfive 2: Enable usb0 and fix tdm pins sort order

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Mon Aug 28 2023 - 07:56:07 EST


On 28/08/2023 13:52, Hal Feng wrote:
> usb0 was disabled by mistake when merging, so enable it.
> tdm_pins node should be sorted alphabetically.
>
> Fixes: e7c304c0346d ("riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110: add the node and pins configuration for tdm")
> Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi | 49 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi
> index d79f94432b27..382dfb5e64e4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi
> @@ -440,30 +440,6 @@ GPOEN_ENABLE,
> };
> };
>
> - uart0_pins: uart0-0 {
> - tx-pins {
> - pinmux = <GPIOMUX(5, GPOUT_SYS_UART0_TX,
> - GPOEN_ENABLE,
> - GPI_NONE)>;
> - bias-disable;
> - drive-strength = <12>;
> - input-disable;
> - input-schmitt-disable;
> - slew-rate = <0>;
> - };
> -
> - rx-pins {
> - pinmux = <GPIOMUX(6, GPOUT_LOW,
> - GPOEN_DISABLE,
> - GPI_SYS_UART0_RX)>;
> - bias-disable; /* external pull-up */
> - drive-strength = <2>;
> - input-enable;
> - input-schmitt-enable;
> - slew-rate = <0>;
> - };
> - };
> -
> tdm_pins: tdm-0 {
> tx-pins {
> pinmux = <GPIOMUX(44, GPOUT_SYS_TDM_TXD,
> @@ -497,6 +473,30 @@ GPOEN_DISABLE,
> input-enable;
> };
> };
> +
> + uart0_pins: uart0-0 {
> + tx-pins {
> + pinmux = <GPIOMUX(5, GPOUT_SYS_UART0_TX,
> + GPOEN_ENABLE,
> + GPI_NONE)>;
> + bias-disable;
> + drive-strength = <12>;
> + input-disable;
> + input-schmitt-disable;
> + slew-rate = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + rx-pins {
> + pinmux = <GPIOMUX(6, GPOUT_LOW,
> + GPOEN_DISABLE,
> + GPI_SYS_UART0_RX)>;
> + bias-disable; /* external pull-up */
> + drive-strength = <2>;
> + input-enable;
> + input-schmitt-enable;
> + slew-rate = <0>;
> + };


What is fixed in this hunk? Order of nodes is just a style, not a bug
needing backports.

Best regards,
Krzysztof