Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-binding: pinctrl: Add NPCM8XX pinctrl and GPIO documentation

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 28/08/2023 13:43, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>>
>>> Which leds to second
>>> question - how pinctrl could have @0? It's already taken by SoC! So your
>>> DTS here - unit address and ranges - are clearly wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>>> BTW, I have run both dt_binding_check and W=1 dtbs_check, and didn't
>>>> see an issue related to the pinctrl: pinctrl@f0800260, do I need to
>>>> add another flag to see the issue?
>>>
>>> Did you read my message last time? I said - it's about DTS, not the binding.
> yes, understood doesn't the dtbs_check check the DTS?

Yes, it does, and the first error is being reported (just like several
others for your DTS...). The second about gpio node, I think is not.

Best regards,
Krzysztof