Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: Drop unused labels from examples
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Mon Oct 02 2023 - 07:17:08 EST
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 09:00:11AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> There's not much point in having unused labels in the binding example,
> so drop them.
>
> This patch was originally motivated by ea25d61b448a ("arm64: dts: qcom:
> Use plural _gpios node label for PMIC gpios") updating all dts files to
> use the plural _gpios label instead of the singular _gpio as label but
> this example wasn't updated. But since we should just drop the label
> alltogether, do that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Conor.
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> index 55e931ba5b47..9fa568603930 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> @@ -239,13 +239,13 @@ examples:
> interrupt-controller;
> #interrupt-cells = <4>;
>
> - pmi8998_lsid0: pmic@2 {
> + pmic@2 {
> compatible = "qcom,pmi8998", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
> reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> - pmi8998_gpio: gpio@c000 {
> + gpio@c000 {
> compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
> reg = <0xc000>;
> gpio-controller;
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ examples:
> };
> };
>
> - pm6150_gpio: gpio@c000 {
> + gpio@c000 {
> compatible = "qcom,pm6150-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
> reg = <0xc000>;
> gpio-controller;
>
> --
> 2.42.0
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature