Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/rt: Move sched_rt_entity::back to under the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED block

[Ingo Molnar]

* Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On 2023/10/9 18:16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > The member back in struct sched_rt_entity only related to RT_GROUP_SCHED,
> > > So move sched_rt_entity::back to under the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED block. It
> > > will save a few bytes.
> > > 
> > > Also, init child when parent isn't NULL in init_tg_rt_entry().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   include/linux/sched.h |  2 +-
> > >   kernel/sched/rt.c     | 18 +++++++++---------
> > >   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > index 292c31697248..d0fe56603e60 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > @@ -597,8 +597,8 @@ struct sched_rt_entity {
> > >   	unsigned short			on_rq;
> > >   	unsigned short			on_list;
> > > -	struct sched_rt_entity		*back;
> > >   #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
> > > +	struct sched_rt_entity		*back;
> > >   	struct sched_rt_entity		*parent;
> > >   	/* rq on which this entity is (to be) queued: */
> > >   	struct rt_rq			*rt_rq;
> > Title claims this change - the rest of the changes should be in a separate
> > patch:
> 
> 
> Okay. I will send v2.

It's ~v7 already by my count, isn't it?

Thanks,

	Ingo