Re: [PATCH v1] samples: kprobes: Fixes a typo

[Steven Rostedt]

On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:09:00 +0530
Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:00:46PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:38:19PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:  
> > > Fixes typo in a function name.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > index cbf16542d84e..ed79fd3d48fb 100644
> > > --- a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > +++ b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct my_data {
> > >  	ktime_t entry_stamp;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > -/* Here we use the entry_hanlder to timestamp function entry */
> > > +/* Here we use the entry_handler to timestamp function entry */
> > >  static int entry_handler(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct my_data *data;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > >   
> > 
> > 	Hi all, can someone provide comments on this change.  
> 
> 			Hi all, can someone please review this change. It has been not
> 			reviewed for quite some time.

That's because trivial typos in comments are considered very low priority,
and are usually only added (if they are ever added) if the maintainer has
extra time, which may not be for a while.

-- Steve