Re: [PATCH v1] samples: kprobes: Fixes a typo

[Google]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 09:51:03 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:09:00 +0530
> Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:00:46PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:38:19PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:  
> > > > Fixes typo in a function name.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > index cbf16542d84e..ed79fd3d48fb 100644
> > > > --- a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > +++ b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct my_data {
> > > >  	ktime_t entry_stamp;
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > > -/* Here we use the entry_hanlder to timestamp function entry */
> > > > +/* Here we use the entry_handler to timestamp function entry */
> > > >  static int entry_handler(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct my_data *data;
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >   
> > > 
> > > 	Hi all, can someone provide comments on this change.  
> > 
> > 			Hi all, can someone please review this change. It has been not
> > 			reviewed for quite some time.
> 
> That's because trivial typos in comments are considered very low priority,
> and are usually only added (if they are ever added) if the maintainer has
> extra time, which may not be for a while.

Anyway, let me pick this. I found this in my inbox now. :)

Thank you,

> 
> -- Steve


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>