Re: [PATCH RFC 02/39] mm/rmap: introduce and use hugetlb_remove_rmap()

[David Hildenbrand]

On 06.12.23 02:22, Yin Fengwei wrote:
> On 12/4/23 22:21, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > hugetlb rmap handling differs quite a lot from "ordinary" rmap code.
> > For example, hugetlb currently only supports entire mappings, and treats
> > any mapping as mapped using a single "logical PTE". Let's move it out
> > of the way so we can overhaul our "ordinary" rmap.
> > implementation/interface.
> >
> > Let's introduce and use hugetlb_remove_rmap() and remove the hugetlb
> > code from page_remove_rmap(). This effectively removes one check on the
> > small-folio path as well.
> >
> > Note: all possible candidates that need care are page_remove_rmap() that
> >        pass compound=true.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

I suspect you wanted to place your RB tag here? :)

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb