Re: [PATCH RFC 02/39] mm/rmap: introduce and use hugetlb_remove_rmap()

[Yin Fengwei]

On 12/6/23 20:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 06.12.23 02:22, Yin Fengwei wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/4/23 22:21, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> hugetlb rmap handling differs quite a lot from "ordinary" rmap code.
>>> For example, hugetlb currently only supports entire mappings, and treats
>>> any mapping as mapped using a single "logical PTE". Let's move it out
>>> of the way so we can overhaul our "ordinary" rmap.
>>> implementation/interface.
>>>
>>> Let's introduce and use hugetlb_remove_rmap() and remove the hugetlb
>>> code from page_remove_rmap(). This effectively removes one check on the
>>> small-folio path as well.
>>>
>>> Note: all possible candidates that need care are page_remove_rmap() that
>>>        pass compound=true.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
> 
> I suspect you wanted to place your RB tag here? :)
Oops. Yes. I meant my RB tag here.


Regards
Yin, Fengwei