Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: BCM63XX: Fix missing prototypes

[Thomas Bogendoerfer]

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 09:46:54AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Most of the symbols for which we do not have a prototype can actually be
> made static and for the few that cannot, there is already a declaration
> in a header for it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/mips/bcm63xx/boards/board_bcm963xx.c | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/bcm63xx/dev-rng.c               | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/bcm63xx/dev-uart.c              | 1 +
>  arch/mips/bcm63xx/dev-wdt.c               | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/bcm63xx/irq.c                   | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/bcm63xx/setup.c                 | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/bcm63xx/timer.c                 | 2 +-
>  7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

applied to mips-fixes.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]