Re: [PATCH net-next] Simplify net_dbg_ratelimited() dummy

[Jiri Pirko]

Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:05:29PM CET, geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>There is no need to wrap calls to the no_printk() helper inside an
>always-false check, as no_printk() already does that internally.
>
>Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>