Re: [PATCH net-next] Simplify net_dbg_ratelimited() dummy

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:05:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> There is no need to wrap calls to the no_printk() helper inside an
> always-false check, as no_printk() already does that internally.

This also makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko