Re: [PATCH] PM: wakeup: Add a missing return case in init_wakeup

From: Dhruva Gole
Date: Thu Mar 14 2024 - 11:19:06 EST


Hi,

On Mar 14, 2024 at 15:01:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 8:55 AM Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The device_wakeup_disable call can return an error if no dev exists
> > however this was being ignored. Catch this return value and propagate it
> > onward in device_init_wakeup.
>
> Why does this matter to the callers of device_init_wakeup()?

If atall !dev->power.can_wakeup then the caller should know something is
funny right?

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/pm_wakeup.h | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> > index 6eb9adaef52b..64c7db35e693 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> > @@ -232,14 +232,15 @@ static inline void pm_wakeup_hard_event(struct device *dev)
> > */
> > static inline int device_init_wakeup(struct device *dev, bool enable)
> > {
> > + int ret;
> > if (enable) {
> > device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
> > - return device_wakeup_enable(dev);
> > + ret = device_wakeup_enable(dev);
> > } else {
> > - device_wakeup_disable(dev);
> > + ret = device_wakeup_disable(dev);
> > device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, false);
> > - return 0;
> > }
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > #endif /* _LINUX_PM_WAKEUP_H */
> >
> > base-commit: 9bb9b28d0568991b1d63e66fe75afa5f97ad1156
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >

--
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx>