Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add IPQ9574 PCIe controller

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Thu Apr 04 2024 - 02:18:52 EST


On 03/04/2024 20:05, mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> On 4/3/24 02:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/04/2024 21:25, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>>> IPQ9574 has PCIe controllers which are almost identical to IPQ6018.
>>> The only difference is that the "iface" clock is not required.
>>> Document this difference along with the compatible string.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
>>> index cf9a6910b542..6eb29547c18e 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ properties:
>>> - qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2
>>> - qcom,pcie-ipq8074
>>> - qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3
>>> + - qcom,pcie-ipq9574
>>> - qcom,pcie-msm8996
>>> - qcom,pcie-qcs404
>>> - qcom,pcie-sdm845
>>> @@ -383,6 +384,35 @@ allOf:
>>> - const: axi_s # AXI Slave clock
>>> - const: axi_bridge # AXI bridge clock
>>> - const: rchng
>>> +
>>> + - if:
>>> + properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + contains:
>>> + enum:
>>> + - qcom,pcie-ipq9574
>>> + then:
>>> + properties:
>>> + clocks:
>>> + minItems: 4
>>> + maxItems: 4
>>> + clock-names:
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: axi_m # AXI Master clock
>>> + - const: axi_s # AXI Slave clock
>>> + - const: axi_bridge # AXI bridge clock
>>> + - const: rchng
>>> +
>>> + - if:
>>> + properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + contains:
>>> + enum:
>>> + - qcom,pcie-ipq6018
>>> + - qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3
>>> + - qcom,pcie-ipq9574
>>> + then:
>>
>> Do not introduce inconsistent style. All if:then: define both clocks and
>> resets, right? And after your patch not anymore?
>>
> I kept the resets in one place because they are the same cross the ipq*
> variants.
>
> Do I understand correctly that you wish me to split up the resets as well?
>
> if ipq8074 ipq6018
> clocks
> resets
>
> if ipq9754
> clocks
> resets

Yes, keep it consistent with all other cases.

Best regards,
Krzysztof