Re: [PATCH 3/3] signalfd: convert to ->read_iter()

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Thu Apr 04 2024 - 08:52:44 EST


On 4/3/24 4:57 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 08:02:54AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Rather than use the older style ->read() hook, use ->read_iter() so that
>> signalfd can support both O_NONBLOCK and IOCB_NOWAIT for non-blocking
>> read attempts.
>>
>> Split the fd setup into two parts, so that signalfd can mark the file
>> mode with FMODE_NOWAIT before installing it into the process table.
>
> Same issue with copy_to_iter() calling conventions; what's more, userland
> really does not expect partial copies here, so it might be worth adding
>
> static inline
> bool copy_to_iter_full(void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i)
> {
> size_t copied = copy_to_iter(addr, bytes, i);
> if (likely(copied == bytes))
> return true;
> iov_iter_revert(i, copied);
> return false;
> }
>
> to include/linux/uio.h for the sake of those suckers. Then
> they could go for
> return copy_to_iter_full(&new, sizeof(new), to) ? sizeof(new) : -EFAULT;
> and similar in other two.

That's a good idea, makes the transformations easier too and avoids
dealine with the partial case.

> NOTE: the userland ABI is somewhat sucky here - if the buffer goes
> unmapped (or r/o) at the offset that is *not* a multiple of
> sizeof(struct signalfd_siginfo), you get an event quietly lost.
> Not sure what can be done with that - it is a user-visible ABI.

The ABI could be nicer, but isn't this a case of "well don't do that
then"?

--
Jens Axboe