Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: handle HAS_IOPORT dependencies

From: Ilpo Järvinen
Date: Mon Apr 08 2024 - 06:25:37 EST


On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, at 11:54, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>
> >> config SERIAL_8250_CS
> >> tristate "8250/16550 PCMCIA device support"
> >> - depends on PCMCIA && SERIAL_8250
> >> + depends on PCMCIA && SERIAL_8250 && HAS_IOPORT
> >> help
> >> Say Y here to enable support for 16-bit PCMCIA serial devices,
> >> including serial port cards, modems, and the modem functions of
> >
> > What about drivers that use SERIAL8250_PORT()?
>
> It probably makes sense to hide these, since they won't ever
> work. I probably missed them in my initial series because they
> don't cause a compile-time error, but I agree that there is no
> use in showing the options here.
>
> > Also port provided in 8250_PNP might expect it I think.
>
> I don't think these need any change: 8250_pnp.c supports
> both IORESOURCE_IO and IORESOURCE_MEM based ports. It will
> still create a 8250 port for the I/O based ones but they
> will now correctly fail to probe in the main driver rather
> than crashing the kernel. PNP devices that only use
> memory BARs will keep working as before, on both machines
> with and without CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT.
>
> I think that most 8250_pnp variants are probably used only
> with ISAPNP or PNPBIOS, neither of which exists without
> HAS_IOPORT,

Okay, seems fine then if that dependency is handled somewhere.

--
i.

> but you could certainly have PNPACPI on arm
> or riscv machines that don't have port I/O but come with
> a memory-mapped 8250 port described by firmware.