Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: add new SPMI vibrator support
From: Fenglin Wu
Date: Thu Apr 11 2024 - 09:52:01 EST
On 2024/4/11 19:02, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 11:32, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay
<devnull+quic_fenglinw.quicinc.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Add support for a new SPMI vibrator module which is very similar
to the vibrator module inside PM8916 but has a finer drive voltage
step and different output voltage range, its drive level control
is expanded across 2 registers. The vibrator module can be found
in following Qualcomm PMICs: PMI632, PM7250B, PM7325B, PM7550BA.
Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
index 2959edca8eb9..35bb6f450fd2 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV (3100)
-#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV (1200)
-#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV (100)
-#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV + VIB_PER_STEP_mV)
+#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV(vib) (vib->drv2_addr ? 3544 : 3100)
+#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib) (vib->drv2_addr ? 1504 : 1200)
+#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib) (vib->drv2_addr ? 8 : 100)
+#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS(vib) (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV(vib) - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib) + VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib))
#define MAX_FF_SPEED 0xff
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ struct pm8xxx_regs {
unsigned int drv_offset;
unsigned int drv_mask;
unsigned int drv_shift;
+ unsigned int drv2_offset;
+ unsigned int drv2_mask;
+ unsigned int drv2_shift;
unsigned int drv_en_manual_mask;
};
@@ -45,6 +48,18 @@ static struct pm8xxx_regs pm8916_regs = {
.drv_en_manual_mask = 0,
};
+static struct pm8xxx_regs pmi632_regs = {
+ .enable_offset = 0x46,
+ .enable_mask = BIT(7),
+ .drv_offset = 0x40,
+ .drv_mask = GENMASK(7, 0),
+ .drv_shift = 0,
+ .drv2_offset = 0x41,
+ .drv2_mask = GENMASK(3, 0),
+ .drv2_shift = 8,
+ .drv_en_manual_mask = 0,
+};
+
/**
* struct pm8xxx_vib - structure to hold vibrator data
* @vib_input_dev: input device supporting force feedback
@@ -53,6 +68,7 @@ static struct pm8xxx_regs pm8916_regs = {
* @regs: registers' info
* @enable_addr: vibrator enable register
* @drv_addr: vibrator drive strength register
+ * @drv2_addr: vibrator drive strength upper byte register
* @speed: speed of vibration set from userland
* @active: state of vibrator
* @level: level of vibration to set in the chip
@@ -65,6 +81,7 @@ struct pm8xxx_vib {
const struct pm8xxx_regs *regs;
unsigned int enable_addr;
unsigned int drv_addr;
+ unsigned int drv2_addr;
int speed;
int level;
bool active;
@@ -82,6 +99,10 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_set(struct pm8xxx_vib *vib, bool on)
unsigned int val = vib->reg_vib_drv;
const struct pm8xxx_regs *regs = vib->regs;
+ /* vibrator without drv2_addr needs be programmed in step increments */
How are these two items related? Are you using vib->drv2_addr as a
marker for 'particular generation'? In such a case please use a flag
instead.
The rest looks good to me.
Are you suggesting to add a flag in pm8xxx_vib as a discriminator for
the new generation? I actually tried to avoid that because of this comment:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/ZgXSBiQcBEbwF060@xxxxxxxxxx/#t
+ if (!vib->drv2_addr)
+ vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib);
+
if (on)
val |= (vib->level << regs->drv_shift) & regs->drv_mask;
else
@@ -93,6 +114,17 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_set(struct pm8xxx_vib *vib, bool on)
vib->reg_vib_drv = val;
+ if (regs->drv2_mask) {
+ if (on)
+ val = (vib->level << regs->drv2_shift) & regs->drv2_mask;
+ else
+ val = 0;
+
+ rc = regmap_write_bits(vib->regmap, vib->drv2_addr, regs->drv2_mask, val);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
if (regs->enable_mask)
rc = regmap_update_bits(vib->regmap, vib->enable_addr,
regs->enable_mask, on ? regs->enable_mask : 0);
@@ -115,17 +147,16 @@ static void pm8xxx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
return;
/*
- * pmic vibrator supports voltage ranges from 1.2 to 3.1V, so
+ * pmic vibrator supports voltage ranges from MIN_LEVEL to MAX_LEVEL, so
* scale the level to fit into these ranges.
*/
if (vib->speed) {
vib->active = true;
- vib->level = ((VIB_MAX_LEVELS * vib->speed) / MAX_FF_SPEED) +
- VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV;
- vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
+ vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib);
+ vib->level += mult_frac(VIB_MAX_LEVELS(vib), vib->speed, MAX_FF_SPEED);
} else {
vib->active = false;
- vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
+ vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib);
}
pm8xxx_vib_set(vib, vib->active);
@@ -203,6 +234,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
vib->enable_addr = reg_base + regs->enable_offset;
vib->drv_addr = reg_base + regs->drv_offset;
+ vib->drv2_addr = reg_base + regs->drv2_offset;
/* operate in manual mode */
error = regmap_read(vib->regmap, vib->drv_addr, &val);
@@ -257,6 +289,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id pm8xxx_vib_id_table[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8058-vib", .data = &pm8058_regs },
{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8921-vib", .data = &pm8058_regs },
{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8916-vib", .data = &pm8916_regs },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,pmi632-vib", .data = &pmi632_regs },
{ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pm8xxx_vib_id_table);
--
2.25.1