Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: add new SPMI vibrator support

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 16:51, Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024/4/11 19:02, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 11:32, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay
> > <devnull+quic_fenglinw.quicinc.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Add support for a new SPMI vibrator module which is very similar
> >> to the vibrator module inside PM8916 but has a finer drive voltage
> >> step and different output voltage range, its drive level control
> >> is expanded across 2 registers. The vibrator module can be found
> >> in following Qualcomm PMICs: PMI632, PM7250B, PM7325B, PM7550BA.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> >> index 2959edca8eb9..35bb6f450fd2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> >> @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
> >>   #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >>   #include <linux/slab.h>
> >>
> >> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV       (3100)
> >> -#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV       (1200)
> >> -#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV        (100)
> >> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS         (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV + VIB_PER_STEP_mV)
> >> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV(vib)  (vib->drv2_addr ? 3544 : 3100)
> >> +#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib)  (vib->drv2_addr ? 1504 : 1200)
> >> +#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib)   (vib->drv2_addr ? 8 : 100)
> >> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS(vib)    (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV(vib) - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib) + VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib))
> >>
> >>   #define MAX_FF_SPEED           0xff
> >>
> >> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ struct pm8xxx_regs {
> >>          unsigned int drv_offset;
> >>          unsigned int drv_mask;
> >>          unsigned int drv_shift;
> >> +       unsigned int drv2_offset;
> >> +       unsigned int drv2_mask;
> >> +       unsigned int drv2_shift;
> >>          unsigned int drv_en_manual_mask;
> >>   };
> >>
> >> @@ -45,6 +48,18 @@ static struct pm8xxx_regs pm8916_regs = {
> >>          .drv_en_manual_mask = 0,
> >>   };
> >>
> >> +static struct pm8xxx_regs pmi632_regs = {
> >> +       .enable_offset = 0x46,
> >> +       .enable_mask = BIT(7),
> >> +       .drv_offset = 0x40,
> >> +       .drv_mask = GENMASK(7, 0),
> >> +       .drv_shift = 0,
> >> +       .drv2_offset = 0x41,
> >> +       .drv2_mask = GENMASK(3, 0),
> >> +       .drv2_shift = 8,
> >> +       .drv_en_manual_mask = 0,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>   /**
> >>    * struct pm8xxx_vib - structure to hold vibrator data
> >>    * @vib_input_dev: input device supporting force feedback
> >> @@ -53,6 +68,7 @@ static struct pm8xxx_regs pm8916_regs = {
> >>    * @regs: registers' info
> >>    * @enable_addr: vibrator enable register
> >>    * @drv_addr: vibrator drive strength register
> >> + * @drv2_addr: vibrator drive strength upper byte register
> >>    * @speed: speed of vibration set from userland
> >>    * @active: state of vibrator
> >>    * @level: level of vibration to set in the chip
> >> @@ -65,6 +81,7 @@ struct pm8xxx_vib {
> >>          const struct pm8xxx_regs *regs;
> >>          unsigned int enable_addr;
> >>          unsigned int drv_addr;
> >> +       unsigned int drv2_addr;
> >>          int speed;
> >>          int level;
> >>          bool active;
> >> @@ -82,6 +99,10 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_set(struct pm8xxx_vib *vib, bool on)
> >>          unsigned int val = vib->reg_vib_drv;
> >>          const struct pm8xxx_regs *regs = vib->regs;
> >>
> >> +       /* vibrator without drv2_addr needs be programmed in step increments */
> >
> > How are these two items related? Are you using vib->drv2_addr as a
> > marker for 'particular generation'? In such a case please use a flag
> > instead.
> >
> > The rest looks good to me.
> >
> Are you suggesting to add a flag in pm8xxx_vib as a discriminator for
> the new generation? I actually tried to avoid that because of this comment:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/ZgXSBiQcBEbwF060@xxxxxxxxxx/#t

Add a flag for level being programmed in steps or in mV. Using
drv2_addr instead of such flag is a hack.

>
> >> +       if (!vib->drv2_addr)
> >> +               vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib);
> >> +
> >>          if (on)
> >>                  val |= (vib->level << regs->drv_shift) & regs->drv_mask;
> >>          else
> >> @@ -93,6 +114,17 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_set(struct pm8xxx_vib *vib, bool on)
> >>
> >>          vib->reg_vib_drv = val;
> >>
> >> +       if (regs->drv2_mask) {
> >> +               if (on)
> >> +                       val = (vib->level << regs->drv2_shift) & regs->drv2_mask;
> >> +               else
> >> +                       val = 0;
> >> +
> >> +               rc = regmap_write_bits(vib->regmap, vib->drv2_addr, regs->drv2_mask, val);
> >> +               if (rc < 0)
> >> +                       return rc;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >>          if (regs->enable_mask)
> >>                  rc = regmap_update_bits(vib->regmap, vib->enable_addr,
> >>                                          regs->enable_mask, on ? regs->enable_mask : 0);
> >> @@ -115,17 +147,16 @@ static void pm8xxx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> >>                  return;
> >>
> >>          /*
> >> -        * pmic vibrator supports voltage ranges from 1.2 to 3.1V, so
> >> +        * pmic vibrator supports voltage ranges from MIN_LEVEL to MAX_LEVEL, so
> >>           * scale the level to fit into these ranges.
> >>           */
> >>          if (vib->speed) {
> >>                  vib->active = true;
> >> -               vib->level = ((VIB_MAX_LEVELS * vib->speed) / MAX_FF_SPEED) +
> >> -                                               VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV;
> >> -               vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
> >> +               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib);
> >> +               vib->level += mult_frac(VIB_MAX_LEVELS(vib), vib->speed, MAX_FF_SPEED);
> >>          } else {
> >>                  vib->active = false;
> >> -               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
> >> +               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib);
> >>          }
> >>
> >>          pm8xxx_vib_set(vib, vib->active);
> >> @@ -203,6 +234,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>
> >>          vib->enable_addr = reg_base + regs->enable_offset;
> >>          vib->drv_addr = reg_base + regs->drv_offset;
> >> +       vib->drv2_addr = reg_base + regs->drv2_offset;
> >>
> >>          /* operate in manual mode */
> >>          error = regmap_read(vib->regmap, vib->drv_addr, &val);
> >> @@ -257,6 +289,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id pm8xxx_vib_id_table[] = {
> >>          { .compatible = "qcom,pm8058-vib", .data = &pm8058_regs },
> >>          { .compatible = "qcom,pm8921-vib", .data = &pm8058_regs },
> >>          { .compatible = "qcom,pm8916-vib", .data = &pm8916_regs },
> >> +       { .compatible = "qcom,pmi632-vib", .data = &pmi632_regs },
> >>          { }
> >>   };
> >>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pm8xxx_vib_id_table);
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >>
> >
> >



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry