Re: [External] Re: [RFC 0/2] riscv: Idle thread using Zawrs extension

[Xu Lu]

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 8:56 PM Christoph Müllner
<christoph.muellner@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 2:44 PM Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 8:26 PM Christoph Müllner
> > <christoph.muellner@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:50 PM Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patch series introduces a new implementation of idle thread using
> > > > Zawrs extension.
> > >
> > > This overlaps with the following series:
> > >   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240315134009.580167-7-ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Hi Christoph.
> > Thanks for your reply!
> > Actually our patch series is different from this. The work from your
> > link focuses on providing support for Zawrs and implementing spinlock
> > using it, while our work focuses on implementing idle thread using
> > Zawrs and accelerating IPI to idle cpu. Of course, the ISA ZAWRS
> > config part can be merged. We will refine our code in the next version
> > to reduce code conflicts.
>
> Yes, I've seen that this targets another optimization, but the basic
> Zawrs support
> would be identical to the other patchset (even if it is not).
> I would propose that we work on a basic Zawrs support patchset that introduces
> the Kconfig, DTS and hwprobe parts (a subset of Andrew's patchset).
> Once this is merged, all other optimizations can be built upon it
> (spinlocks, idle thread, glibc CPU spinning).
> If this proposal is fine for the maintainers/reviewers, then Andrew could resend
> these basic-support patches.
>
> BR
> Christoph

Roger that! This does make more sense. We will rebase our code on
Andrew's basic support patches in the next version.

Regards,
Xu Lu

>
>
> >
> > >
> > > BR
> > > Christoph
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The Zawrs[0] extension introduces two new instructions named WRS.STO and
> > > > WRS.NTO in RISC-V. When software registers a reservation set using LR
> > > > instruction, a subsequent WRS.STO or WRS.NTO instruction will cause the
> > > > hart to stall in a low-power state until a store happens to the
> > > > reservation set or an interrupt becomes pending. The difference between
> > > > these two instructions is that WRS.STO will terminate stall after an
> > > > implementation-defined timeout while WRS.NTO won't.
> > > >
> > > > This patch series implements idle thread using WRS.NTO instruction.
> > > > Besides, we found there is no need to send a real IPI to wake up an idle
> > > > CPU. Instead, we write IPI information to the reservation set of an idle
> > > > CPU to wake it up and let it handle IPI quickly, without going through
> > > > tranditional interrupt handling routine.
> > > >
> > > > [0] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-zawrs/blob/main/zawrs.adoc
> > > >
> > > > Xu Lu (2):
> > > >   riscv: process: Introduce idle thread using Zawrs extension
> > > >   riscv: Use Zawrs to accelerate IPI to idle cpu
> > > >
> > > >  arch/riscv/Kconfig                 |  24 +++++++
> > > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/cpuidle.h   |  11 +---
> > > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h     |   1 +
> > > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h |  31 +++++++++
> > > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h       |  14 ++++
> > > >  arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c            |   5 ++
> > > >  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c     |   1 +
> > > >  arch/riscv/kernel/process.c        | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c            |  39 +++++++----
> > > >  9 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.20.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv