Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_allocate_new_section

[Markus Elfring]

…
> missed this allocated path, fix it.

* Will another imperative wording be desirable for an improved change description?

* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes”?

* How do you think about to append parentheses to the function name
  in the summary phrase?


Regards,
Markus