Re: [net] ipv6: sr: fix missing sk_buff release in seg6_input_core

[Markus Elfring]

* The message subject would have been a bit nicer with the key word “PATCH”.

* How do you think about to append parentheses to the function name?


…
> The proposed patch addresses the identified memory leak by …

Will a corresponding imperative wording be more desirable for
an improved change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94

Regards,
Markus