Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: pwm: describe the cells in #pwm-cells in pwm.yaml

[Rob Herring (Arm)]

On Fri, 17 May 2024 18:38:46 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When commit 89650a1e3b6f ("dt-bindings: pwm: Convert PWM bindings
> to json-schema") converted the pwm provider section of the text binding
> to dt-schema it also updated all references to pwm.txt in pwm provider
> bindings to pwm.yaml.
> 
> Most pwm provider bindings had a reference to pwm.txt as it contains a
> description of what the cells in #pwm-cells are, albeit in the consumer
> section of the document. Only information in the provider section of the
> document was moved to the yaml binding, and it contains no information
> about the cell format, making all references to it for the cell format
> unhelpful.
> 
> Fixes: 89650a1e3b6f ("dt-bindings: pwm: Convert PWM bindings to json-schema")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> I yoinked the wording from pwm.txt. Having "Typically" feels a bit
> clumsy, but a given provider is free to override that order AFAIU.
> 
> CC: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: linux-pwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>