Re: [PATCH 09/12] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: make use of QCOM_FW_HELPER

[Jeff Johnson]

On 5/21/2024 2:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Make the driver use qcom_fw_helper to autodetect the path to the
> calibration data file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> index 421a3943a90d..45fc578ae30b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/qcom/fw_helper.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
>  
> @@ -555,8 +556,13 @@ static int wcnss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	fw_name = qcom_get_board_fw(fw_name);
> +	if (!fw_name)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &wcnss_ops,
>  				 fw_name, sizeof(*wcnss));
> +	kfree(fw_name);
>  	if (!rproc) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> 

can you cleanly bisect to this patch? seems it depends upon patch 10.
should 09 & 10 be swapped, or perhaps squashed?