Re: [PATCH 09/12] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: make use of QCOM_FW_HELPER
From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Wed May 22 2024 - 16:42:53 EST
On Wed, 22 May 2024 at 22:22, Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 5/21/2024 2:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Make the driver use qcom_fw_helper to autodetect the path to the
> > calibration data file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> > index 421a3943a90d..45fc578ae30b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> > #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
> > +#include <linux/soc/qcom/fw_helper.h>
> > #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
> > #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
> >
> > @@ -555,8 +556,13 @@ static int wcnss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + fw_name = qcom_get_board_fw(fw_name);
> > + if (!fw_name)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &wcnss_ops,
> > fw_name, sizeof(*wcnss));
> > + kfree(fw_name);
> > if (!rproc) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
>
> can you cleanly bisect to this patch? seems it depends upon patch 10.
> should 09 & 10 be swapped, or perhaps squashed?
Yes. I think I got this mixed during rebasing and squashing of the
changes. For v2, if the approach is found to be generally acceptable,
I'll squash them.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry