Re: [RFC 0/9] Nginx refcount scalability issue with Apparmor enabled and potential solutions

[Mateusz Guzik]

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:09 PM John Johansen
<john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 3/2/24 02:23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On 2/9/24, John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 2/6/24 20:40, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> >>> Gentle ping.
> >>>
> >>> John,
> >>>
> >>> Could you please confirm that:
> >>>
> >>> a. The AppArmor refcount usage described in the RFC is correct?
> >>> b. Approach taken to fix the scalability issue is valid/correct?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Neeraj,
> >>
> >> I know your patchset has been waiting on review for a long time.
> >> Unfortunately I have been very, very busy lately. I will try to
> >> get to it this weekend, but I can't promise that I will be able
> >> to get the review fully done.
> >>
> >
> > Gentle prod.
> >
> > Any chances of this getting reviewed in the foreseeable future? Would
> > be a real bummer if the patchset fell through the cracks.
> >
>
> yes, sorry I have been unavailable for the last couple of weeks. I am
> now back, I have a rather large backlog to try catching up on but this
> is has an entry on the list.
>

So where do we stand here?

-- 
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>