Re: [RFC 0/9] Nginx refcount scalability issue with Apparmor enabled and potential solutions

[John Johansen]

On 5/24/24 14:10, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:09 PM John Johansen
> <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 3/2/24 02:23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > On 2/9/24, John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On 2/6/24 20:40, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> > > > > Gentle ping.
> > > > >
> > > > > John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you please confirm that:
> > > > >
> > > > > a. The AppArmor refcount usage described in the RFC is correct?
> > > > > b. Approach taken to fix the scalability issue is valid/correct?
> > > >
> > > > Hi Neeraj,
> > > >
> > > > I know your patchset has been waiting on review for a long time.
> > > > Unfortunately I have been very, very busy lately. I will try to
> > > > get to it this weekend, but I can't promise that I will be able
> > > > to get the review fully done.
> > >
> > > Gentle prod.
> > >
> > > Any chances of this getting reviewed in the foreseeable future? Would
> > > be a real bummer if the patchset fell through the cracks.
> >
> > yes, sorry I have been unavailable for the last couple of weeks. I am
> > now back, I have a rather large backlog to try catching up on but this
> > is has an entry on the list.
>
> So where do we stand here?
sorry I am still trying to dig out of my backlog, I will look at this,
this weekend.