Re: [RFC 0/9] Nginx refcount scalability issue with Apparmor enabled and potential solutions

[Mateusz Guzik]

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:52 PM John Johansen
<john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/24 14:10, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:09 PM John Johansen
> > <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/2/24 02:23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >>> On 2/9/24, John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> On 2/6/24 20:40, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> >>>>> Gentle ping.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> John,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could you please confirm that:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> a. The AppArmor refcount usage described in the RFC is correct?
> >>>>> b. Approach taken to fix the scalability issue is valid/correct?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Neeraj,
> >>>>
> >>>> I know your patchset has been waiting on review for a long time.
> >>>> Unfortunately I have been very, very busy lately. I will try to
> >>>> get to it this weekend, but I can't promise that I will be able
> >>>> to get the review fully done.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Gentle prod.
> >>>
> >>> Any chances of this getting reviewed in the foreseeable future? Would
> >>> be a real bummer if the patchset fell through the cracks.
> >>>
> >>
> >> yes, sorry I have been unavailable for the last couple of weeks. I am
> >> now back, I have a rather large backlog to try catching up on but this
> >> is has an entry on the list.
> >>
> >
> > So where do we stand here?
> >
> sorry I am still trying to dig out of my backlog, I will look at this,
> this weekend.
>

How was the weekend? ;)

-- 
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>