Re: [PATCH] md: make md_flush_request() more readable

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Sun May 26 2024 - 04:54:26 EST


On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 02:56:22AM +0800, linan666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> - bio = NULL;
> - }
> - spin_unlock_irq(&mddev->lock);
> -
> - if (!bio) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&mddev->lock);
> INIT_WORK(&mddev->flush_work, submit_flushes);
> queue_work(md_wq, &mddev->flush_work);
> } else {
> /* flush was performed for some other bio while we waited. */
> + spin_unlock_irq(&mddev->lock);
> if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size == 0)
> /* an empty barrier - all done */

This stil looks like a somwwhat odd flow Why not go all the way
and turn it into:


...
queue_work(md_wq, &mddev->flush_work);
return true;
}

/* flush was performed for some other bio while we waited. */
spin_unlock_irq(&mddev->lock);
if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size == 0) {
/* pure flush without data - all done */
bio_endio(bio);
return true;
}
bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_PREFLUSH;
return false;
}