Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec-mux: nb7vpq904m: broadcast typec state to next mux

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 09:45:30AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> In the Type-C graph, the nb7vpq904m retimer is in between the USB-C
> connector and the USB3/DP combo PHY, and this PHY also requires the
> USB-C mode events to properly set-up the SuperSpeed Lanes functions
> to setup USB3-only, USB3 + DP Altmode or DP Altmode only on the 4 lanes.
> 
> Update the nb7vpq904m retimer to get an optional type-c mux on the next
> endpoint, and broadcast the received mode to it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/typec/mux/nb7vpq904m.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/nb7vpq904m.c b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/nb7vpq904m.c
> index b17826713753..efb10f890fed 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/nb7vpq904m.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/nb7vpq904m.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct nb7vpq904m {
>  
>  	bool swap_data_lanes;
>  	struct typec_switch *typec_switch;
> +	struct typec_mux *typec_mux;
>  
>  	struct mutex lock; /* protect non-concurrent retimer & switch */
>  
> @@ -275,6 +276,7 @@ static int nb7vpq904m_sw_set(struct typec_switch_dev *sw, enum typec_orientation
>  static int nb7vpq904m_retimer_set(struct typec_retimer *retimer, struct typec_retimer_state *state)
>  {
>  	struct nb7vpq904m *nb7 = typec_retimer_get_drvdata(retimer);
> +	struct typec_mux_state mux_state;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&nb7->lock);
> @@ -292,7 +294,14 @@ static int nb7vpq904m_retimer_set(struct typec_retimer *retimer, struct typec_re
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&nb7->lock);
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mux_state.alt = state->alt;
> +	mux_state.data = state->data;
> +	mux_state.mode = state->mode;
> +
> +	return typec_mux_set(nb7->typec_mux, &mux_state);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct regmap_config nb7_regmap = {
> @@ -411,9 +420,16 @@ static int nb7vpq904m_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(nb7->typec_switch),
>  				     "failed to acquire orientation-switch\n");
>  
> +	nb7->typec_mux = fwnode_typec_mux_get(dev->fwnode);
> +	if (IS_ERR(nb7->typec_mux)) {
> +		ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(nb7->typec_mux),
> +				    "Failed to acquire mode-switch\n");
> +		goto err_switch_put;
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = nb7vpq904m_parse_data_lanes_mapping(nb7);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_mux_put;
>  
>  	ret = regulator_enable(nb7->vcc_supply);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -456,6 +472,12 @@ static int nb7vpq904m_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	gpiod_set_value(nb7->enable_gpio, 0);
>  	regulator_disable(nb7->vcc_supply);
>  
> +err_mux_put:
> +	typec_mux_put(nb7->typec_mux);
> +
> +err_switch_put:
> +	typec_switch_put(nb7->typec_switch);

Same comment, typec_switch_put should go to a separate commit. IMHO it
almost begs us to have devm_fwnode_typec_mux_get() and
devm_fwnode_typec_switch_get().

> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -469,6 +491,9 @@ static void nb7vpq904m_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	gpiod_set_value(nb7->enable_gpio, 0);
>  
>  	regulator_disable(nb7->vcc_supply);
> +
> +	typec_mux_put(nb7->typec_mux);
> +	typec_switch_put(nb7->typec_switch);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct i2c_device_id nb7vpq904m_table[] = {
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry