Re: [EXTERNAL]Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: add VEML6040 RGBW-LS bindings

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Tue, 28 May 2024 07:23:03 +0000
Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks for the Review!
> Right, I wasn't sure if and how to add the veml6040 to the veml6075 dt-binding file.
> I'll modify that the next time I make adjustments to the driver.

It's absolutely fine to have shared bindings even if the
drivers (because of different register interface etc) are completely
separate.  It's a good way to keep bindings aligned between
similar devices.

Jonathan

> 
> Kind regards,
> Arthur
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 27 May 2024 18:31
> To: Arthur Becker; Jonathan Cameron; Lars-Peter Clausen; Rob Herring; Krzysztof Kozlowski; Conor Dooley
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: add VEML6040 RGBW-LS bindings
> 
> On 27/05/2024 17:12, Arthur Becker via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Device tree bindings for the vishay VEML6040 RGBW light sensor iio
> > driver
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V1 -> V3: Addressed review comments (v1 of the dt-bindings was sent
> > along with v2 of the driver but not in a set)  
> 
> It's basically the same as veml6075, so should be put there...
> 
> Eh,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
>