Re: [PATCH] null_blk: fix validation of block size

[Bart Van Assche]

On 6/2/24 16:59, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 6/2/24 19:57, John Garry wrote:
> > On 01/06/2024 21:23, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> > > From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Block size should be between 512
> > > and 4096
> >
> > Or PAGE_SIZE?
>
> PAGE_SIZE can be larger than 4096. But most drives are 512 or 4096 LBA-sized.

null_blk is not a physical device. Hence, why not to use 
blk_validate_block_size() here?

Thanks,

Bart.