Re: [PATCH] RFC: sched: Rework task_sched_runtime to avoid calling update_rq_clock
From: John Stultz
Date: Tue Jun 18 2024 - 00:45:51 EST
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:42 PM John Stultz <jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Also, separately, while I didn't see this earlier testing on physical
> devices, when running virtualized, I can pretty easily trip over the
> following:
>
> [ 65.207340] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s!
> [kworker/0:3:374]
> [ 65.211107] irq event stamp: 118664
> [ 65.212786] hardirqs last enabled at (118663):
> [<ffffffff97a00e46>] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
> [ 65.218440] hardirqs last disabled at (118664):
> [<ffffffff977fdeca>] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0xc0
> [ 65.223074] softirqs last enabled at (118546):
> [<ffffffff9676db78>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x88/0xe0
> [ 65.227118] softirqs last disabled at (118541):
> [<ffffffff9676db78>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x88/0xe0
> [ 65.231137] CPU: 0 PID: 374 Comm: kworker/0:3 Not tainted
> 6.10.0-rc4-dirty #4393
> [ 65.234625] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
> [ 65.239089] Workqueue: events psi_avgs_work
> [ 65.241122] RIP: 0010:collect_percpu_times+0xff/0x310
...
> [ 65.288730] Call Trace:
> [ 65.289958] <IRQ>
> [ 65.290965] ? watchdog_timer_fn+0x275/0x310
> [ 65.293185] ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn+0x10/0x10
> [ 65.295379] ? __hrtimer_run_queues+0x190/0x3b0
> [ 65.297795] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0xf9/0x230
> [ 65.299782] ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x82/0x210
> [ 65.302243] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x98/0xc0
> [ 65.304590] </IRQ>
> [ 65.305658] <TASK>
> [ 65.306708] ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
> [ 65.309206] ? psi_avgs_work+0x3c/0xb0
> [ 65.311001] ? collect_percpu_times+0xff/0x310
> [ 65.313153] psi_avgs_work+0x3c/0xb0
> [ 65.314864] process_one_work+0x1fe/0x700
> [ 65.316782] ? lock_is_held_type+0xcd/0x120
> [ 65.318782] worker_thread+0x1c7/0x3b0
> [ 65.320571] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [ 65.322626] kthread+0xe0/0x110
> [ 65.324103] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 65.325853] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
> [ 65.327512] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 65.329255] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> [ 65.331073] </TASK>
> [ 65.332119] Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
As I've been digging on this some more, I'm still a bit baffled. The
kworker seems to get stuck once the irq lands and we don't seem to go
back to the workqueue work that was in progress. That cpu ends up not
doing anything but occasionally handling ticks until we crash from the
softlockup watchdog.
Interestingly, if I move the psi_account_irqtime() call to be under
the rq_lock in sched_tick(), as I suggested earlier, I have yet to
reproduce the problem.
But I'm still trying to piece together exactly why.
thanks
-john