Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon Jun 24 2024 - 04:36:07 EST

Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.10-rc5"
Previous message: Devin Bayer: "Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: support the disable camera LED on F10 of Zenbook 2023"
In reply to: kernel test robot: "[axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression"
Next in thread: Niklas Cassel: "Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This is odd to say at least. Any chance you can check the value
of /sys/block/$DEVICE/queue/rotational for the relevant device before
and after this commit? And is this an ATA or NVMe SSD?

Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.10-rc5"
Previous message: Devin Bayer: "Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: support the disable camera LED on F10 of Zenbook 2023"
In reply to: kernel test robot: "[axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression"
Next in thread: Niklas Cassel: "Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]