Re: [PATCH v2] s390/ism: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size in ism_probe()
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Thu Jun 27 2024 - 03:18:03 EST
> As the possible failure of the dma_set_max_seg_size(), we should better
> check the return value of the dma_set_max_seg_size().
Please avoid the repetition of a function name in such a change description.
Can it be improved with corresponding imperative wordings?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94
…
> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,10 @@ static int ism_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> goto err_resource;
>
> dma_set_seg_boundary(&pdev->dev, SZ_1M - 1);
> - dma_set_max_seg_size(&pdev->dev, SZ_1M);
> + ret = dma_set_max_seg_size(&pdev->dev, SZ_1M);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_resource;
> +
> pci_set_master(pdev);
…
A) Will the shown dma_set_seg_boundary() call trigger similar software development concerns?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc5/source/include/linux/dma-mapping.h#L562
B) Under which circumstances would you become interested to increase the application
of scope-based resource management here?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc5/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L8
Regards,
Markus