linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v tree with the risc-v-fixes tree

[Mark Brown]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v tree got a conflict in:

  arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c

between commit:

  edf2d546bfd6f ("riscv: patch: Flush the icache right after patching to avoid illegal insns")

from the risc-v-fixes tree and commit:

  47742484ee162 ("riscv: Remove extra variable in patch_text_nosync()")

from the risc-v tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
index ab03732d06c46,5b3f6406e8c44..0000000000000
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
@@@ -200,10 -186,11 +202,9 @@@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_insn_set)
  
  int patch_text_set_nosync(void *addr, u8 c, size_t len)
  {
- 	u32 *tp = addr;
  	int ret;
  
- 	ret = patch_insn_set(tp, c, len);
+ 	ret = patch_insn_set(addr, c, len);
 -	if (!ret)
 -		flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)addr, (uintptr_t)addr + len);
  
  	return ret;
  }
@@@ -232,10 -222,11 +236,9 @@@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_insn_write)
  
  int patch_text_nosync(void *addr, const void *insns, size_t len)
  {
- 	u32 *tp = addr;
  	int ret;
  
- 	ret = patch_insn_write(tp, insns, len);
+ 	ret = patch_insn_write(addr, insns, len);
 -	if (!ret)
 -		flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)addr, (uintptr_t)addr + len);
  
  	return ret;
  }

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature