Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not lower timeout to CLOSE for in-window RSTs

[Florian Westphal]

yyxRoy <yyxroy22@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With previous commit https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/be0502a
> ("netfilter: conntrack: tcp: only close if RST matches exact sequence")
> to fight against TCP in-window reset attacks, current version of netfilter
> will keep the connection state in ESTABLISHED, but lower the timeout to
> that of CLOSE (10 seconds by default) for in-window TCP RSTs, and wait for
> the peer to send a challenge ack to restore the connection timeout
> (5 mins in tests).
> 
> However, malicious attackers can prevent incurring challenge ACKs by
> manipulating the TTL value of RSTs. The attacker can probe the TTL value
> between the NAT device and itself and send in-window RST packets with
> a TTL value to be decreased to 0 after arriving at the NAT device.
> This causes the packet to be dropped rather than forwarded to the
> internal client, thus preventing a challenge ACK from being triggered.
> As the window of the sequence number is quite large (bigger than 60,000
> in tests) and the sequence number is 16-bit, the attacker only needs to
> send nearly 60,000 RST packets with different sequence numbers
> (i.e., 1, 60001, 120001, and so on) and one of them will definitely
> fall within in the window.
> 
> Therefore we can't simply lower the connection timeout to 10 seconds
> (rather short) upon receiving in-window RSTs. With this patch, netfilter
> will lower the connection timeout to that of CLOSE only when it receives
> RSTs with exact sequence numbers (i.e., old_state != new_state).

This effectively ignores most RST packets, which will clog up the
conntrack table (established timeout is 5 days).

I don't think there is anything sensible that we can do here.

Also, one can send train with data packet + rst and we will hit
the immediate close conditional:

   /* Check if rst is part of train, such as
    *   foo:80 > bar:4379: P, 235946583:235946602(19) ack 42
    *   foo:80 > bar:4379: R, 235946602:235946602(0)  ack 42
    */
    if (ct->proto.tcp.last_index == TCP_ACK_SET &&
        ct->proto.tcp.last_dir == dir &&
        seq == ct->proto.tcp.last_end)
            break;

So even if we'd make this change it doesn't prevent remote induced
resets.

Conntrack cannot validate RSTs precisely due to lack of information,
only the endpoints can do this.