Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion

[Nikita Shubin]

Arnd, 

Are we continuing this patch series ?

You are silent since last version submit, which makes me a bit worried.

If you suddenly changed your mind please let us know, cause anyway we
have no possibility to merge these series without you.


On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 11:21 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:29:44AM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 19:20 +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > > Hello Andy!
> > > On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 12:58 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:38 AM Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay
> > > > <devnull+nikita.shubin.maquefel.me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to
> > > > > merge it
> > > > > via Arnd branch.
> > > > 
> > > > 'receive'
> > > > 
> > > > > Unfortunately, CLK subsystem suddenly went silent on clk
> > > > > portion
> > > > > of
> > > > > series V2 reroll,
> > > > > tried to ping them for about a month but no luck.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Link:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408-ep93xx-clk-v2-1-adcd68c13753@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > 
> > > > > Some changes since last version (v9) - see "Changes in v10",
> > > > > mostly
> > > > > cosmetic.
> > > > 
> > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > > Patches should be formated with '--histogram'
> > > > 
> > > > 'formatted'
> > > > 
> > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > > Changes in v10:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reordered SoB tags to make sure they appear before Rb and
> > > > > Acked
> > > > > tags.
> > > > 
> > > > This is not required. The importance is only the order of SoBs
> > > > themselves. If they are interleaved with other tags, it's fine.
> > > 
> > > Ah - ok. Just saw someone was complaining about b4 reordering
> > > them. 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hopefully to see this series being eventually applied soon.
> > > > Arnd? (Do we have all necessary subsystem maintainers' tags,
> > > > btw?)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > As i see from my perspective only three left:
> > > 
> > > Clk subsystem:
> > > 
> > > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx
> > > 
> > > DMA subsystem (but the only request from Vinod, as far as i
> > > remember,
> > > was fixing commits titles):
> > > 
> > > - dmaengine: cirrus: Convert to DT for Cirrus EP93xx
> > > - dmaengine: cirrus: remove platform code
> > > 
> > > Beside that tags missing on platform code removal (which can be
> > > Acked
> > > by Arnd himself i believe) and dtsi/dts files (same ?).
> > 
> > Vinod acked the above two patches:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZnkIp8bOcZK3yVKP@matsya/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZnkImp8BtTdxl7O3@matsya/
> > 
> > so only:
> > 
> > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617-ep93xx-v10-3-662e640ed811@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > left.
> > 
> > Hope Stephen will find some time for this one.
> 
> As we're approaching the merge window and this is still unclear, I
> applied the pwm bits (i.e. patches 12, 13). If I understand
> correctly,
> patch 33 isn't suitable for application yet as it has a dependency on
> pinctrl changes in that series.
> 
> (side note: Your patches are signed, but that doesn't bring any
> benefit
> if the receivers don't have your key. I didn't find it neither on
> keys.openpgp.org nor in the kernel pgp key collection.)
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe