Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tools subcmd: Add non-waitpid check_if_command_finished()

From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Sat Jul 13 2024 - 11:00:10 EST


On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:19:58PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 1:33 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:24:50PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:24 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ian,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:42:35PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > > Using waitpid can cause stdout/stderr of the child process to be
> > > > > lost. Use Linux's /prod/<pid>/status file to determine if the process
> > > > > has reached the zombie state. Use the 'status' file rather than 'stat'
> > > > > to avoid issues around skipping the process name.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c b/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c
> > > > > index 4e3a557a2f37..ec06683e77a0 100644
> > > > > --- a/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c
> > > > > +++ b/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c
> > > > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > > > > #include <unistd.h>
> > > > > #include <sys/types.h>
> > > > > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > > > > +#include <ctype.h>
> > > > > #include <fcntl.h>
> > > > > #include <string.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/string.h>
> > > > > @@ -217,8 +218,40 @@ static int wait_or_whine(struct child_process *cmd, bool block)
> > > > >
> > > > > int check_if_command_finished(struct child_process *cmd)
> > > > > {
> > > > > +#ifdef __linux__
> > > >
> > > > Is this really necessary? I don't think we plan to support other OS..
> > >
> > > I don't think it'd be unreasonable to say run "perf report" on
> > > Windows, or using wasm inside a web browser. Part of the reason for
> > > doing things this way was to keep the WNOHANG logic although this
> > > change no longer uses it for __linux__.
> >
> > I'm not sure we are ready to run it on other platforms. So I think
> > it's better simply remove it for now.
>
> So in the office hours there was some discussion with a potential new
> contributor whose development platform is OS/X. It's fairly obvious
> this code can't work on anything but Linux and using #error feels
> annoying. The waitpid code is tested and has a known issue, but I
> think it is better than just breaking anyone not on Linux.

I feel like it's a potential issue and should be handled by the
potentiall contributor. Until that happens, we can assume Linux
and keep the code minimal.

Thanks,
Namhyung

> >
> > > > > + char filename[FILENAME_MAX + 12];
> > > > > + char status_line[256];
> > > > > + FILE *status_file;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * Check by reading /proc/<pid>/status as calling waitpid causes
> > > > > + * stdout/stderr to be closed and data lost.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + sprintf(filename, "/proc/%d/status", cmd->pid);
> > > > > + status_file = fopen(filename, "r");
> > > > > + if (status_file == NULL) {
> > > > > + /* Open failed assume finish_command was called. */
> > > > > + return true;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + while (fgets(status_line, sizeof(status_line), status_file) != NULL) {
> > > > > + char *p;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (strncmp(status_line, "State:", 6))
> > > > > + continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + fclose(status_file);
> > > > > + p = status_line + 6;
> > > > > + while (isspace(*p))
> > > > > + p++;
> > > > > + return *p == 'Z';
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + /* Read failed assume finish_command was called. */
> > > > > + fclose(status_file);
> > > > > + return true;
> > > > > +#else
> > > > > wait_or_whine(cmd, /*block=*/false);
> > > > > return cmd->finished;
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > int finish_command(struct child_process *cmd)
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
> > > > >